About

Motivation and Problem Context

Understanding the mechanisms governing urban movement remains a central problem across transportation systems modeling and regional planning. While traditional travel behavior scholarship has long focused on characterizing how individuals navigate multimodal networks, translating empirical mobility records into actionable predictive models and public safety interventions poses distinct technical challenges. These challenges manifest across two critical domains:

  1. Resolving travel mode choices from rich sociodemographic and spatial covariates, as these choices are closely related to Houstonians’ daily commutes and other activities undertaken to meet their needs, and relatedly
  2. Isolating high-risk transportation corridors from observational collision data to formulate safety countermeasures.

We propose The Houston Mobility Games, a student competition designed to address these challenges through two complementary tracks. Rather than evaluating models in the abstract, this initiative bridges interpretable machine learning and evidence-based policy analysis by anchoring both tracks in localized, real-world data.

  • Track A is a leaderboard-scored prediction contest: students predict how students at Houston-area campuses get to campus (i.e., which travel mode they use), and analyze which factors matter most in that that decision.
  • Track B is a traffic safety analysis competition: students identify Houston's most dangerous corridors from crash records and propose countermeasures. Students may enter either or both.

Centennial Impact

As UH marks its centennial, the Houston Mobility Games brings together students across disciplines to address mobility and safety challenges affecting the university and the wider Houston region. Combining travel behavior research, predictive machine learning, and spatial analytics, the competition encourages students to connect technical findings with an understanding of people’s transportation needs.

Participants will gain experience in reproducible analysis, model interpretation, and translating evidence into recommendations for safer and more accessible transportation. Their findings could inform campus mobility planning and regional safety discussions, while selected projects could serve as teaching materials and starting points for future student research, extending the competition’s educational value beyond the centennial year.

Data Infrastructure and Track Structure

Both competition tracks leverage fully acquired, cleaned, and profiled datasets, eliminating operational licensing dependencies:

Track A (Mode Choice Inference)

Built on the 2025 Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) University Travel Survey (N = 6,523 respondents across 14 regional campuses, including 2,739 UH students). The task is framed over 5,518 validated records collapsed into seven discrete access modes:

  • Drive Alone (57.0%)
  • Dropped Off (20.4%)
  • Transit (7.9%)
  • Active Transportation (5.4%)
  • Carpool (4.0%)
  • Campus Shuttle (3.2%)
  • Ride-Hail (2.0%)

With a majority-class benchmark of 57.0%, evaluation tests whether models capture non-majority transit and active modes. Features include socioeconomic indicators, geocoded residential census blocks, vehicle availability, and transit pass status.

Track B (Spatiotemporal Crash Modeling):

Built on multi-year TxDOT CRIS collision records for Harris County. Teams identify corridors bearing a disproportionate share of serious injuries and fatalities (KABCO scale), select a focal segment, and quantify countermeasure safety benefits while accounting for traffic exposure and baseline assumptions.

Deliverables & Scoring

Probabilistic Scoring and Rigor (Track A)

Submissions require class probability distributions evaluated against held-out test splits. Performance tracking utilizes a public/private partition to penalize leaderboard overfitting. In addition to top-1 accuracy and separability metrics, teams submit a two-page technical report documenting feature engineering, cross-validation protocols, model architectures, and an interpretation of key predictors and their contributions to travel mode predictions.

Countermeasure Justification and Exposure Control (Track B)

Teams deliver a six-page analytical memorandum directed to municipal stakeholders, accompanied by reproducible code and high-resolution spatial maps. Judging panels evaluate data integrity, severity weighting schemes, explicit accounting for baseline traffic exposure, and transparency regarding analytical limitations

Summary

Track A — Mode Choice Inference Track B — Spatiotemporal Crash Analytics
Primary Objective Multiclass mode choice estimation Spatial risk modeling & countermeasure evaluation
Target Audience Computer science, math, statistics, engineering, data science Engineering, planning, architecture, public health, policy, business
Team size 1–3 2–4
Scoring 70% automated metric, 30% written model report 100% expert rubric & Final Presentation
Primary Output Probabilistic submission & validation pipeline 6-page municipal policy memo & code repo

Contest Organizers

Lead organizer Ekin Ugurel, Assistant Professor, Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Houston — eugurel@central.uh.edu
Co-organizer Kailai Wang, Assistant Professor, Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Houston — kwang43@central.uh.edu

Judges & Agency Partners

Competition Schedule

Date Milestone Description
Oct 08, 2026 Registration Opens Individuals and incomplete teams can sign up.
Oct–Nov 2026 Judge & Agency Partner Recruitment Ekin, Kailai, and Gino recruit judges and agency partners.
Jan 29, 2027 Team Formation Mixer & Prep Workshop Formal rules, rubrics, and data dictionaries released. Light snacks and refreshments provided.
Feb 5 Team Registration Closes Deadline for team registration.
Feb 19 (Friday) Competition Kickoff Data released. Agency partners frame the Track B problem.
Feb 19–28 Competition Sprint Two weekends of competition, with midweek office hours.
Mar 1–10 Submission Judging Judges review Track A reports and Track B memos.
Mar 12 Finalists Announced Anticipated selection: top 5–6 teams in Track B and top 3 in Track A.
Mar 15–21 Spring Break No competition activities.
Mar 22–Apr 2 Track B Finalist Feedback Each finalist receives one 30-minute feedback session with an agency partner.
Apr 7 Finalist Slides Due Deadline for finalist presentation slides.
Apr 9 Finals Track B presentations to the panel and short talks from the Track A top 3.
Apr 20 Awards Ceremony Winners announced and prizes awarded.

Ready to Register Your Team?

Ensure your team meets all qualifications.

Team Registration

Contact Us

If you have any questions about the contest, please reach out to Kailai Wang, Associate Professor at kwang43@central.uh.edu.